W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:32:07 -0400
Message-ID: <5065DF17.4080405@mit.edu>
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
CC: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 9/28/12 12:38 PM, Travis Leithead wrote:
> It seems more important to check for the features of the spec, rather than spec support in general. I would expect if (URL.createObjectURL) for example.

You have it backwards.  That's checking for the file API bits.  How do 
you check whether you can actually work with URL objects?

-Boris
Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 17:32:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:54 GMT