W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2012

[pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:17:36 -0400
Message-ID: <50632AA0.7040704@nokia.com>
To: ext Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>
CC: "public-webapps@w3c.org" <public-webapps@w3c.org>
On 9/26/12 11:46 AM, ext Vincent Scheib wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>> * Pointer Lock - Vincent - what's the status of the spec and its implementation?
> Firefox 14 and Chrome 22 shipped Pointer Lock implementations to
> stable channel users recently. (Check out this Mozilla demo
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/demos/detail/bananabread, using
> either.)
>
> Pointer Lock specification did have minor adjustments (inter-document
> and iframe sandbox security issues, pending state and mouse movement
> clarifications). diffs:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerlock/log/default/index.html
>
> So, I'm happy to prepare an updated working draft.

Thanks for the update Vincent!

Do you and/or the implementers consider the spec feature complete, which 
is a major factor to determine if the spec is "Last Call ready" (other 
considerations are documented at [1])?

(Bugzilla reports "Zarro Boogs found" [2] and I didn't notice any 
"issue/bug" blocks in the latest ED).

-Thanks, Art

[1] <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call>
[2] 
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=Pointer%20Lock&resolution=---> 
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 16:18:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:54 GMT