On 9/20/12 8:24 PM, ext Samuel Bronson wrote: > This does not make it clear why the specification was abandoned, or > say where more recent efforts in this area are focused; I suggest > changing it to something more like: Thanks for the suggestion. If/when we publish that document again, I will propose some additional context re the rationale be added. -Thanks, ABReceived on Friday, 21 September 2012 11:08:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:54 GMT