Re: Sync API for workers

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote:

> On 09/01/2012 11:38 PM, Rick Waldron wrote:
>
>  So far, they all look async. Just calling them "sync" doesn't make them
>> "sync".
>>
>
> Sure they are sync. They are sync inside worker. We all know that we must
> not introduce
> new sync APIs in the main thread.
>
>
>
See my response to Oliver Hunt's message

Rick