Hi Glenn, > > var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(); > > xhr.open("GET", "resource.jpg"); > > var urlObject = xhr.getURLObject(); > > var newURL = URL.getObjectURL(urlObject); > > img.src = newURL; It's neat and I like the idea, too. However, there is a reason that I prefer our blob approaches: > > === Another XHR Approach > > > > partial interface XMLHttpRequest { > > Blob makeLazyBlob (); > > }; > > > > Usage: [Service] > > var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(); > > xhr.open("GET", "/kitten.png", true); > > xhr.setRequestHeader("Authorization", "Basic DEADBEEF"); > > var blob =xhr.makeLazyBlob(); window.intent.postResult(blob); >From totally client developer's point of view, who perhaps do not care the underlying details at all, it is absolutely transparent to use the obtained blob as they used to deal with. (no matter which type of data the blob contains) [Client] navigator.startActivity(intent, resultOK); function resultOK (data) { // *data* is a blob delivered by service end. it can be a few MB of image file (kitten.png in the above example) or a few MB of mp3 music file or a few MB of raw text file or a huge binary string etc. var blob = data; var reader = new FileReader(); // developers have all the existing file reader options with no additional concern such that they do any further operations with the result reader.readAsDataURL(blob); // or reader.readAsBinaryString(blob); // or reader.readAsText(blob); // or reader.readAsArrayBuffer(blob); } Regards, Jungkee Jungkee Song Samsung ElectronicsReceived on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 09:07:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:54 GMT