Re: Lazy Blob from Glenn Adams on 2012-08-06 (public-webapps@w3.org from July to September 2012)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 14:40:39 -0600
To: Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+er8dDqGp1qNn3tjJTD6hMSXYh_w5VFx+UKqJO+OgJWOw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>
>> The same reason that a remote blob would be useful with XHR.
>>
> Since you're steadfastly refusing to detail your use case, that'll just
> mean "none" to me.

I feel I don't have any obligation to justify the use of WS any more than
that necessary for XHR. It is simply short-sighted to define a remote blob
only for XHR. If you can't see that, then let's not waste our time
continuing this thread.

Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 20:41:27 UTC