W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Lazy Blob

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 01:44:11 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cwFbTJe3GNV7OnQK3tx1UN7wFYem5PoYk=aX8bAxbkzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Glenn Adams wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't really care about the XHR side of this (happy to let Anne
> > > figure that out), but since WebSockets was mentioned: what's the use
> > > case that involves Web Socket? I don't really understand what problem
> > > we're trying to solve here.
> >
> > i would like to support two use cases:
> >
> > (1) simple - single blob send, single blob response
> > (2) multiple - multiple instances of simple, i.e., send/response pairs
>
> Sorry, I was vague. What I mean is what user-facing problem is it that
> we're trying to solve?


see DAR's initial message in this thread; bringing WS into scope doesn't
change the problem statement, it merely enlarges the solution space, or
keeps it from being unnecessarily narrow
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 07:45:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:54 GMT