Re: Lazy Blob

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> I don't particularly care if a default behavior for WS is provided that
> buffers the entire read stream.
>

Sorry, but that doesn't make sense.  You don't access a message-based
protocol (Web Sockets) using a character-based API (Blob).  They're utterly
different APIs.

I'll leave the details of defining this to the proposers of lazy blob.
>

You're free to come up with your own proposal, of course, and editors and
vendors will choose among them (or come up with something else, or reject
the idea entirely) as they always do, but others are not obligated to twist
their proposals to your demands.

-- 
Glenn Maynard

Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 03:36:17 UTC