W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2012

[Server-sent Events] Status of 26-April-2012 LC comments

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:06:44 -0400
Message-ID: <50056364.3090206@nokia.com>
To: Odin HÝrthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>, Neil Jenkins <neilj@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Charles McCathieNevile <w3b@chaals.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi All,

The comment deadline for the April 26 SSE LC [LC] ended May 17. Since 
the LC was published, I noted 2 comments, 1 bug report (see below) and 5 
ED updates (see below).

The comments are:

1. 17-Apr-2012; Odin HÝrthe Omdal (Opera); 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0226.html 
; [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification.

Odin HÝrthe, Hixie, All, - I don't see a clear conclusion/consensus and 
no bug was filed. As such, please indicate - via a reply to the 
_original_ thread - your take on this comment and please file a bug if 
applicable.

2. 29-Apr-2012; Neil Jenkins (Opera); [Server-Sent Events] Network 
connection clarification ; 10-July-2012 Hixie suggests error handling 
could be supported for v2 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JulSep/0094.html>. 
Additionally, Chaals indicated in 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JulSep/0129.html> this 
could be considered a v1 bug.

Neil, Hixie, Chaals, All, - I don't see a clear conclusion/consensus and 
no bug was filed. As such, please indicate - via a reply to the 
_original_ thread - your take on this comment and please file a bug if 
applicable.

(If these two comments do not require substantive changes for v1, it 
appears the spec is ready for a CfC to publish as a Candidate 
Recommendation.)

-Thanks, Art

[LC] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-eventsource-20120426/

= Bug report: only 16866 
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16866>; 26-Apr-2012 
filed by annevk@opera.com; FIXED on 10-July-2012 ; Fix: 
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/eventsource/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.219;r2=1.220;f=h>. 
I consider this a non-substantive change

= ED Updates (the LC was based on 1.215)

* 216 
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/eventsource/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.215;r2=1.216;f=h>. 
Non-substantive (stylesheet update)

* 217 
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/eventsource/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.216;r2=1.217;f=h>. 
Non-substantive(change "event name" to "event type")

* 218 
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/eventsource/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.217;r2=1.218;f=h>. 
Non-substantive (one additional change of "event name" to "event type")

* 219 
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/eventsource/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.218;r2=1.219;f=h>.Non-substantive 
(remove "[TreatNonCallableAsNull]" WebIDL qualifier from attributes)

* 220 
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/eventsource/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.219;r2=1.220;f=h>. 
Non-substantive (fixes bug 16866)

= Bugs Open when CfC for LC was started: 14900, 15495, 16070, hence an 
indication the group does not consider them mandatory for v1
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:07:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:54 GMT