Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org> wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2012 3:06 PM, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/5/12 3:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, I think consistency matters a lot here. I'm not aware of any other
>>> Web-facing API that takes a pure object with callback functions.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Traversal-Range/traversal.html#Traversal-NodeFilter
>> (the acceptNode function).
>>
>> Or was the point about having multiple callback functions?
>
> Precisely about having multiple callback functions.
>
> Also to respond to some of earlier comments, I don't think most web
> developers think of passing objects when adding event listeners.

Why does having one callback function rather than two make
implementation harder?

/ Jonas

Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 23:48:50 UTC