W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: [webcomponents] Progress Update

From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:35:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CADh5Ky3jYdf0gv6sgzmxF_5b=3nc3ob8SbZs0Yy2wF8W1MkJug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Cc: Jarred Nicholls <jarred@webkit.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Derp! Apologies for sending a dead link. Here's the link to the first
draft: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/c387b50a991a/spec/templates/index.html

I also left an unfinished sentence in the status update. Awesome work, Dimitri.

The sentence should read:

"Even though it may not be possible to fully emulate the shadow DOM on
legacy rendering engines, we will try to have at least a functional
equivalent."

:DG<

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure... Note that tip is in the "wrong" link I sent too, it's just
> pointing to the wrong doc :)
> I was just noting that I got it from the "latest version of this doc"
> link in that revision which is (currently) actually pointing to the
> tip of shadow, not templates.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jarred Nicholls <jarred@webkit.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Whoops... that does not appear to be the same file.  Appears that the
>>> repo points to
>>>
>>>
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/c2f82425ba8d/spec/templates/index.html
>>>
>>
>> FYI "tip" will point to the latest
>> revision: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html
>>
>>>
>>> However in that doc listed as the latest editors draft is the one for
>>> shadow I included below. ??
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > on:
>>> > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/spec/templates/index.html
>>> >  as listed below, it returns "error: revision not found: spec".
>>> >
>>> > I think it should be:
>>> > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/shadow/index.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Hello, public-webapps!
>>> >>
>>> >> Here's another summary of work, happening in Web Components.
>>> >>
>>> >> SHADOW DOM
>>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=14978)
>>> >> * First bits of the Shadow DOM test suite have landed:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ShadowDOM/tests/submissions/Google/tests.html
>>> >> * More work in spec, long tail of edge cases and bugs:
>>> >>  - You can now select elements, distributed into insertion points
>>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16176)
>>> >>  - A bug in adjusting event's relatedTarget was discovered and fixed
>>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16176)
>>> >>  - As a result of examining Viewlink (an IE feature), more events are
>>> >> now stopped at the boundary
>>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15804)
>>> >>  - Fixed a bug around scoping of styles
>>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16318)
>>> >> * Started restructuring CSS-related parts of the spec to accommodate
>>> >> these new features:
>>> >>  - Specify a way to select host element
>>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15220)
>>> >>  - Consider a notion of shared stylesheet
>>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15818)
>>> >>  - Consider a flag for resetting inherited styles at the shadow
>>> >> boundary (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15820)
>>> >> * Experimental support of Shadow DOM in WebKit is slowly, but surely
>>> >> gaining multiple shadow DOM subtree support
>>> >> (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77503)
>>> >>
>>> >> HTML TEMPLATES
>>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=15476):
>>> >> * First draft of the specification is ready for review:
>>> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/spec/templates/index.html.
>>> >> * Most mechanical parts are written as deltas to the HTML spec, which
>>> >> offers an interesting question of whether this spec should just be
>>> >> part of HTML.
>>> >>
>>> >> CODE SAMPLES
>>> >> (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=14956):
>>> >> * Web Components Polyfill
>>> >> (https://github.com/dglazkov/Web-Components-Polyfill) now has unit
>>> >> tests and a good bit of test coverage. Contributions are appreciated.
>>> >> Even though it may not
>>> >>
>>> >> ADDITIONAL WAYS TO STAY UPDATED:
>>> >> * https://plus.google.com/b/103330502635338602217/
>>> >> * http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/rss-log
>>> >> * follow the meta bugs for each section.
>>> >>
>>> >> :DG<
>>> >>
>>>
>>
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 16:35:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT