W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

RE: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26

From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:38:01 +0000
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9768D477C67135458BF978A45BCF9B383828321E@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:chaals@opera.com]
>
>On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:24:23 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 10:58, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>
>>> Cameron has addressed the comments from Web IDL LC#3 [1] and the bug
>>> list only contains two enhancement requests [2]. As such, this is a call
>>> for consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL using the
>>> following ED as the basis:
>>>
>>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/

>>>
>>> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's
>>> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for
>>> Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process
>>> Document:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs

>>>
>>> Positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be
>>> considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for comments is
>>> March 26 and all comments should be sent to public-webapps at w3.org
>>> (http://w3.org).
>>>
>> Would be nice if there was a test suite before progressing to CR…
>
>Indeed. It would be nice to have a pony. I support the proposal.
>

I also support publication.
Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 17:38:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT