W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal

From: Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:24:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHpoE=juf-zDx+NUsOx-TCxd9f5Xeqdr3zR7Gxptnno-RZLipw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Cc: Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>, Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>, Feras Moussa <ferasm@microsoft.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
>> Separately defining blobs to be transferrable feels like an unneeded
>> complexity. A caller wishing to
>> neuter after sending can explicit call .close() rather than relying on
>> more obscure artifacts of having also put the 'blob' in a
>> 'transferrable' array.
>
>
> You can always call close() yourself, but Blob.close() should use the
> "neuter" mechanism already there, not make up a new one.

Blobs aren't transferable, there is no existing mechanism that applies
to them. Adding a blob.close() method is independent of making blob's
transferable, the former is not prerequisite on the latter.
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 22:24:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT