W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

[Bug 16013] New: objectStoreNames order should be specified (alphabetic?)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:05:33 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-16013-2927@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16013

           Summary: objectStoreNames order should be specified
                    (alphabetic?)
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Indexed Database API
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: odinho@opera.com
         QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org


We should probably specify objectStoreNames order.

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#widl-IDBDatabase-objectStoreNames
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#widl-IDBDatabaseSync-objectStoreNames

I suggest changing:

> On getting, this attribute must return a list of names of the object stores
> currently in the connected database. 

To:

> On getting, this attribute must return a list of names of the object stores
> currently in the connected database sorted in ascending order.


Should also specify what we mean by sorted in ascending order here. Probably
the same as is already said for comparing DOMStrings in keys.

E.g. step 5 of http://es5.github.com/#x11.8.5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 13:05:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT