W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: StreamBuilder threshold

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:41:53 +0100
To: "Stefan Hakansson LK" <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "Travis Leithead" <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "Feras Moussa" <ferasm@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v87er3xh64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:05:05 +0100, Feras Moussa <ferasm@microsoft.com>  
> When designing the StreamBuilder API, we looked at it as a more  
> primitive API which other abstractions (such as multiple consumers) can  
> be built upon.

We should not have a StreamBuilder API. We should have a Stream  
constructor, similar to how we should not have a BlobBuilder API, but a  
Blob constructor (and we do now, I believe). It's a lot cleaner and in  
line with best practices for platform API design (which are undocumented,  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Sunday, 5 February 2012 11:44:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:38 UTC