W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal

From: Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:33:53 +0100
Message-ID: <4F26FEB1.1000501@bauglir.com>
To: public-webapps@w3.org


On 30.1.2012 17:51, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> The same blob should have different URLs in different documents, no?
>> All documents originated from the same application/session/same-origin?
>
> No.  That's the point.  Unless you want the lifetime of the Blob to 
> immediately become "while you have any documents from this origin open".
>
> Or in more concrete terms, while you Google Reader is open, no Blobs 
> on any google.com page that have had urls created for them would ever 
> be collected.  That seems very bad.
>
>> I'd prefer the same URL ( e.g. just passing string using
>> window.postMessage) . What if I move image element from one document to
>> another (from top window to iframe) should it have no identifiable
>> underlying data? I don't like that
>
> It's not great; the alternatives just seem worse.
>
> -Boris
>
This is just bad... I could go for "same origin is problem", but same 
"original document" (other document spawned by this document based on 
same origin - iframe, window.open, etc. respecting same origin policy). 
Because this is just bad... It's like every time one might think "hey, I 
can create application without web server", there's specification 
laughing and throwing bricks at you. Again, the easiest way to handle 
that is to simply upload that image to server using AJAX, let URL be 
returned (regular http://) and no problem at all... There's been great 
progress in all regarding FileApi, but being able to work with the 
result is just pain...

Is there any way we can come up with any conclusion here? I'm fine with 
current one, though I understand that explicit memory management is 
little bit odd for some people.
I really do think that while assigning blob to src attribute can make 
some some on setter level (just some sense), it makes no sense on getter 
level (when what you need to work with is text, like we everybody is 
used to for 2 decades and because it is HTML attribute, it must have 
some string representation).

Brona
Received on Monday, 30 January 2012 20:34:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT