W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

CfC: publish new LCWD of Web IDL; deadline February 3

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:10:10 -0500
Message-ID: <4F229422.7090107@nokia.com>
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Cameron has completed addressing open Web IDL comments including LC #2 
comments [1] and the only open bugs are enhancement requests [2]. As 
such, this is Call for Consensus to publish a new Last Call Working 
Draft using the following ED as the basis:

    http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/

This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's 
decision to request advancement" for this LCWD.

Note the Process Document states the following regarding the 
significance/meaning of a LCWD:

[[
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call

Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant 
technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) 
in the Working Draft;

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant 
dependencies with other groups;

* other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these 
dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement 
is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the 
technical report to later maturity levels.
]]

Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence 
will be considered as agreement with the proposal. The deadline for 
comments is February 3. Please send all comments to:

   public-script-coord@w3.org

-Art Barstow

[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/lc2.txt
[2] 
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=WebIDL&resolution=---


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17
Date: 	Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:11:27 +1100
From: 	ext Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
To: 	Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
CC: 	public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>



Arthur Barstow:
>  Rather than immediately starting a CfC to publish a new LCWD, let's
>  first have a two week pre-LC Request for Comments period using the
>  latest ED as the basis:
>
>  http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/

Comments over this period have been addressed.  We should publish now.
I have begun to prepare the two documents for publication:

   http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
   http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/java.html

The pubrules checker seems to be broken at the moment, so I haven't done
that yet.
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 12:10:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT