W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:33:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cWjBoJXD6bnwhN69TJukc4DQLfYduQFE5POyVq3=wQEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
The problem is that the proposal (as I understand it) is to insert
something like:

"DOM2 (a REC) is obsolete. Use DOM4 (a work in progress)."

This addition is tantamount (by the reading of some) to demoting the status
of DOM2 to "a work in progress".

2012/1/24 Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>

> Hello,
> I do understand the objection, but how relevant should it be here? If some
> regulation/law dictates that work must follow e.g. DOM 2, than it does not
> matter that it's obsolete... The law takes precedence here regardless of
> status of the document. Technically in such case one don't need to worry
> himself about any progress or status of such document or specification.
>
>
> On 23.1.2012 19:06, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> I object to adding such notice until all of the proposed replacement
>> specs reach REC status.
>>
>> G.
>>
>>  Brona
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 19:34:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT