W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [websockets] Seeking comments on moving back to CR; deadline June 28

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:37:42 +0200
Message-ID: <4FED4D36.9040108@gmx.de>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 2012-06-29 05:55, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 6/21/12 4:53 PM, ext Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2012-06-21 16:28, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> ...
>>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0880.html>
>>> -
>>> This is an editorial bug and is already captured in Bug 12510. Ideally,
>>> this bug would be fixed before the v1 CR branch is created. However, if
>>> Hixie can't fix it before then and if no one else creates an acceptable
>>> patch for Hixie, I don't support blocking the v1 CR for this.
>>> ...
>>
>> I disagree that this is editorial.
>
> Yes I agree that "editorial" wasn't a particularly good characterization
> of bug 12510.
>
>
>> Without proper references the spec simply is incomplete.
>
>
> Now that we have the URL spec in /TR/, it seems like that spec just
> needs to be added as a reference.

That's necessary but not sufficient. When spec A references spec B, it 
should be obvious from the text; right now it is not.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 06:38:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT