W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Feedback on Quota Management API

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:42:44 +0000
To: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
CC: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, Kinuko Yasuda <kinuko@chromium.org>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Eric U <ericu@google.com>
Message-ID: <C1FE552C-CF35-4E9B-8D61-3B6BAF9A35E3@fb.com>
On Jun 27, 2012, at 9:14, "Ms2ger" <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 06/27/2012 05:44 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:44 AM, "Glenn Maynard"<glenn@zewt.org>  wrote:
>>> Unrelated, screaming-caps on RFC2119 terms (eg. "MUST") is jarring
>>> and unnecessary.  I'd suggest dropping the em.rfc2119 style.
>>> That's what HTML, DOM4, etc. do, and it's much more readable.
>> 
>> How do you distinguish between 'MUST' and 'must' then? I agree the
>> style is jarring, but maybe that can be fixed rather then completely
>> removed.
> 
> Specifications must not use RFC2119 keywords to mean anything else than the meaning RFC2119 assigns to those keywords.
> 
> HTH
> Ms2ger

Wasn't aware. Thanks for the clarification.

--tobie
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 16:43:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT