Re: [IndexedDB] Normative content arguably informative in IndexedDB LC draft from Jonas Sicking on 2012-06-04 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2012)

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 00:27:40 -0700
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA+c2ei-VJL=QMjhLYetWmfujN3sFCSR1bRb6_BqGZ0hF1Y73Tw@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for finding this. I filed
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17303

/ Jonas

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Section 6 (Privacy) and 7 (Authorization) of the IndexedDB LC draft[1]
> feel very informative, yet they're not marked as such.
>
> Is there ground to keep them as normative content or should we explicitly
> mark them as non-normative, remove their usage of the RFC 2119 MAY
> keyword, and mark the linked references ([COOKIES]) as informative?
>
> Best,
>
> --tobie
>
> ---
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-IndexedDB-20120524/
>
>

Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 07:36:57 UTC