W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?

From: Fabrice Desre <fabrice@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:54:05 -0700
Message-ID: <4FC99C6D.5000501@mozilla.com>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
CC: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-native-web-apps@w3.org" <public-native-web-apps@w3.org>
On 06/01/2012 02:36 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:58 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com
> <mailto:w3c@marcosc.com>> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good. AFAICT, Moz's proposal doesn't really cover packaging
>> either ... Not in the sense of wrapping the app using zip or
>> something. More metadata, feature control (potentially relevant to
>> requiring certain SysApps API), and lifecycle management.
>
> Agreed. I'd be curious to see how it's planning to interact with
> AppCache (if at all). Also whether integration with a JSON version of
> AppCache has been considered.

We're working on pre-loading the appcache at install time when the 
appcache path is specified in the manifest. See 
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702369 for the b2g support, 
and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753990 for desktop support.

	Fabrice
-- 
Fabrice Desré
b2g team
Mozilla Corporation
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2012 04:54:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT