W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 23:16:20 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@google.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205102314510.25792@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Fri, 11 May 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> 
> This solves exactly the jQuery use-case of "parse a document fragment 
> from a string".

Fantastic! Let's use it then.


> It doesn't solve the *almost* identical case of "parse the contents of a 
> <template>", because there you don't have a root element.

That's fine. We don't have to have the same solution for every problem.


> > But I'm very skeptical about creating new APIs to encourage authors to 
> > use injection-prone, non-type-checked, direct string manipulation in 
> > script to generate DOM trees.
> 
> As others have said, you've lost this race.

People said the same about <font>. I chose to be more optimistic.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 23:16:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT