W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [IndexedDB] Checked in fix for ReSpec issue

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 22:56:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+c2ei8EtB=LGBjJWxEQJYtVSzYHWMjpu0jmAe9iEkuVkBgfqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 02 May 2012 13:46:27 -0700, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>>
>> I certainly agree that it would be better to move the definition of
>> when to throw exceptions into the prose for each function and
>> attribute, but that's a big change that I don't think we should block
>> on. (In fact, it might be big enough that we don't want to take it on
>> at all, but that's something we shouldn't decide on here).
>
> Is the order of exceptions defined? E.g. if a method can throw two different
> exceptions and you violate both requirements, which exception throws? That's
> one of the minor problems this legacy DOM-style gives.

I suspect that's not always defined no. It doesn't seem like a huge
deal, but it's definitely another argument for moving away from
depending on the current style.

/ Jonas
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 05:57:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT