W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:33:45 +0200
To: public-webapps@w3.org, "Ryosuke Niwa" <rniwa@webkit.org>
Cc: "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@gmail.com>, "Rafael Weinstein" <rafaelw@google.com>, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <op.wdc52jqs64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:05:28 +0200, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org> wrote:
> Also, I think Anne convinced me that it's better to deduce the insertion
> mode from the first element than inventing a new insertion mode (I've  
> asked him to post his reasoning).

1) You cannot look at various elements and make a decision. E.g. if your  
first element is <plaintext> there will not be any other elements.

2) Defining a new top-level insertion mode while retaining compatible  
behavior might be an interesting exercise in parser complexity, but it's  
not clear there is a benefit (use cases?) and feasibility has not been  
demonstrated (consider handling <p><td><p>, <tr><p><td>, ...). The more we  
can define in terms of the existing parser, the better it is for  
developers. The behavior will be more predictable and there will be less  
quirks to learn.

FWIW, https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14694 is the bug on  
the DOM Parsing spec, I don't think there's a bug on the HTML spec (other  
than https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16635 for SVG/MathML),  
but I might be mistaken.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 08:34:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT