W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

RE: publish LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline April 23

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:27:09 +0000
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <59A39E87EA9F964A836299497B686C350FE929F9@WABOTH9MSGUSR8D.ITServices.sbc.com>
I support the LCWD publication.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan 

-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 4:44 AM
To: public-webapps
Subject: CfC: publish LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline April 23

The Server-sent Events spec has three open bugs:

* 14900 - suggests adding an origin warning check
* 15495 - generic comment re Web platform (not really SSE specific)
* 16070 - request for additional reference

I don't see any of these bug as important enough to block LC so this is 
a Call for Consensus to publish a new LCWD with these bugs open, using 
the latest ED as the basis <http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/>.

This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's 
decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process 
Document states the following regarding the significance/meaning of a LCWD:

[[
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call

Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant 
technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) 
in the Working Draft;

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant 
dependencies with other groups;

* other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these 
dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement 
is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the 
technical report to later maturity levels.
]]

If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them to 
public-webapps@w3.org by April 23 at the latest. Positive response is 
preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be agreement 
with the proposal.

-Thanks, AB
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 06:28:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:51 GMT