W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:23:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4F85F666.905@mit.edu>
To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
CC: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 4/11/12 5:04 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> When/if we start using the "Binary Data" instead of re-purposing typed
> arrays.

Then we'll need to add more send() overloads, probably.  What those 
overloads will be, exactly, depends on the final state of the Binary 
Data spec.  I don't see the problem, honestly.

>> postMessage does arbitrary object graphs, which can include either
>> ArrayBuffers or ArrayBufferViews. If you try to postMessage a typed
>> array, the receiver will get a typed array, as expected.
> My understanding is/was that an ArrayBufferView will be copied whereas
> an ArrayBuffer will be neutered/transferred.

This understanding is incorrect, as stated.

The only things that are transferred are the ones listed in the 
sequence<Transferable> argument.

If you don't list anything there, 
will be run on everything.  This will call into 
http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/#9.3 and then 
http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/#9.1 and copy 
all the various ArrayBufferViews and ArrayBuffers.

You can't list an ArrayBufferView in the trasferable list.

You _can_ list an ArrayBufer in the transferable list; if that's the 
case it will be neutered and transferred. If there are ArrayBufferViews 
being cloned that reference this ArrayBuffer, the clones will reference 
the transferred buffer.

> These practices are already established. You're exploring ways to make
> using them easier.

Passing typed arrays to send() can't possibly be "established" since 
it's not exactly supported very well across browsers (and is disallowed 
by the spec at the moment).

> Typed Arrays have matured.

So?  I'm not proposing changing anything about typed arrays.  I'm 
proposing expanding the set of things that can be passed to send().

> They're available in all major implementations

They're not available in any shipping IE version, last I checked.

> I know they can be a pain in the ass, but they are functioning.

That has nothing to do with the arguments allowed for XHR.send().

Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 21:24:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:40 UTC