W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Priorities and expectations for 2012

From: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:28:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4EF973A9.6000900@ericsson.com>
To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 12/23/2011 06:37 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been thinking a bit about realistic expectations for 2012 for those
> specs that are already in scope in the WG's current charter (complete
> spec list is at [PubStatus]).
>
> Below is a list (in alphabetical order) of what I consider the WG's
> higher priority specs including my expectations for the new year and
> some related open tasks for the specs. One criteria for putting
> something on the list is the spec's relative maturity i.e. has at least
> one LC been published and/or is there already some implementation.
> Maturity level is relevant because the WG's IP commitments are not
> finalized until a spec reaches the Recommendation status.
>
> * CORS (WD) - address open bugs; publish LCWD; create comprehensive test
> suite; this spec needs some tutorial/primer/how-to type documentation
>
> * DOM 3 Events (LCWD) - complete LC#2 comment processing; publish new
> LCWD; if clear implementation commitment from at least Mozilla and
> Microsoft, move the spec to CR
>
> * File API (WD) - address open bugs; integrate Microsoft's Stream API
> features<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm>;
> move to feature complete and publish LCWD; start test suite
The Stream API also impacts the XMLHttpRequest spec, right? And 
potentially WebSockets (if you would like to send a Stream over a WS), 
or have I got it wrong?

Stefan
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2011 07:29:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:49 GMT