W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Web IDL sequence<T> and item() method

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:21:11 +0100
To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v6bq9lx264w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:51:48 +0100, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> If the answer is that no item() method is implied, then does the use of
> sequence<T> in these newer specs entail dropping this method (with  
> respect to prior DOM specs)?

The DOM specifications probably need to move back to using interface  
rather than sequence. I was hoping sequence would define the whole  
collection thing magically, but it never turned out that way. Still not  
quite sure what the real use case is for sequence.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Sunday, 11 December 2011 12:24:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:37 UTC