W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

RE: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404

From: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:27:29 +0000
To: "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: Adam Herchenroether <aherchen@microsoft.com>, Jim Wordelman <jaword@microsoft.com>, Victor Ngo <vicngo@microsoft.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F695AF7AA77CC745A271AD0F61BBC61E413D0112@TK5EX14MBXC113.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On Saturday, December 03, 2011 9:25 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > Jonas,
> >
> > Since you believe we should keep the values of version as a non-nullable
> long long, what should the value of version be during the first run/creation if
> the transaction is aborted? Should it be 0 (I don't believe we want version to
> be a negative number)?
> I realized the other day that the question also applies to what should
> db.objectStoreNames return? It makes sense that whatever changes we
> make to .version we'd also make to .objectStoreNames. Do we revert it to
> the value it had before the transaction was started? Do we throw?
> Do we return null/0?
> Ultimately I feel like there really is very little reason for someone to use
> these properties if the VERSION_CHANGE transaction fails, and so I'm
> leaning more towards that we should do whatever is easy to implement.
> So what I suggest is that we do the same thing as for .close(). I.e.
> we leave the values untouched. This seems not only easy to implement but
> also is consistent with .close().
> / Jonas

What about this behavior to summarize all ideas:

Once the onupgradeneeded handler is called, the database is automatically created.  If the VERSION_CHANGE transaction is aborted for any reason when the database is being created for the first time, the database will remain in the system with the following attributes: name="assigned db name", version = 0, and objectStoresNames = null.

Do you agree?

Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:28:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:37 UTC