W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:11:42 +0100
To: "ext Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v5taxssk64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:29:37 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>  
wrote:
> It appears Adrian is proposing:
>
>   .../TR/XMLHttpRequest/  be a WG Note but it's not clear to me what  
> version of XHR would be used: the 3-Aug-2010 XHR CR, the last ED that  
> was created, some other version?
>
>   .../TR/XMLHttpRequest2/ be used for Anne's merged version and titled  
> "XMLHttpRequest Level 2".
>
> Anne, All - WDYT?
>
> Adrian - if there is consensus to do something like the above, would you  
> commit to doing the editorial work on the WG Note?
>
> (FWIW, I think Adrian's proposal is reasonable and it meets the I Can  
> Live With It Test and if Anne wants the ED to remain version-less,  
> that's OK, provided L2 is added to versions published in /TR/.)

It seems totally pointless to me, but we can add even more cruft to the  
TR/ versions, sure. I should probably also add a disclaimer similar to  
what http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ has so it is clear TR/ does not represent  
the latest version.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 13:12:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:49 GMT