W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed

From: João Eiras <joaoe@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:16:49 -0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.v5qgebkx2q99of@coruscant>
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:42:59 -0000, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> My stated goal was to argue that working on XPath is a bad idea

You can argue that it's wasted effort or duplicated by CSS Selectors  
(although XPath is already specified, implemented and deployed unlike the  
new Selector features), but it goes a long way for you to claim it is a  
*bad* idea.

I still think you are underestimating XPath. There are things possible in  
XPath today that will never be possible with Selectors in the  
unforeseeable future, like a parent selector, or doing a case insensitive  
substring match of a node's text content (from any descendant).

If you're suggesting forking Selectors into the ones used in stylesheet,  
and the others used in the Selector API, then it is repeated effort and a  
*bad* idea because those use cases are already covered today with already  
deployed XPath and its DOM 3 XPath API, which is convoluted and hard to  
use, which is what people are trying to make friendlier. And it would  
definitely confuse everyone, because then developers would need to know  
which features they can use in stylesheets and which they cannot.
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 00:17:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:49 GMT