W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?

From: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 09:51:34 -0600
Message-ID: <CAE5ikSZ6S=3VVrJ1J1oxFd-JHa-PfiEJhTf6f1vyCPRO542-OA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
I've been half following this thread.
I'm not sure why renaming to XHR is a good idea.
The DOM spec has levels (Level 2, 3) so I don't see the need to consolidate.
I like the distinction and it gives devs some marker to follow for
support in libs/projects.
If you did drop the XHR levels, which I am not for, then a prominent
comment block should persist explaining it.

- JDD

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> Are you suggesting that the link [1] be changed to forward or refer to the
> new XHR2 work?
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-XMLHttpRequest-20100803/
> If so, then that would be a problem.
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> well, what I was asking is to make sure that if I go to xhr1 I actually
>> find 2
>> Anyway I think this is what marcos and anne were saying, so fine.
>
Received on Sunday, 27 November 2011 15:52:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:49 GMT