Works for me. I can live with .matches, but .matchesSelector is too verbose. Yehuda Katz (ph) 718.877.1325 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote: > > I like .is, the name jQuery uses for this purpose. Any reason not to go > with > > it? > > We might want it for something else. .matches clearly sounds like > it's selector-related, and I have more trouble thinking of another > meaning we'd ever really want for it. >Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 18:34:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:49 GMT