- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:09:50 -0500
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
On 11/22/11 8:05 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > The current draft of Selectors 4 includes :matches(), though, which can > partially handle that case, excluding :not([type]), which would have to > be left separate. That seems like a bug in :matches() that just needs fixing if it's meant as a replacement for :any(). -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 13:10:19 UTC