W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?

From: Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:19:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMFeDTUtm28fohQSZ6Pr2Hrf+45=K80=aNXdQEn5boZh50X7Pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325


On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 11/21/11 11:31 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
>> 1)  Make sense.
>>> 2)  Not break existing content.
>>> 3)  Be short.
>>>
>>
>> .matches
>> .is
>>
>
I like .is, the name jQuery uses for this purpose. Any reason not to go
with it?


>
> The sticking point here is obviously item #2.  Data needed on use of
> "matches" and "is" as barewords in on* attributes, specifically.
>
> -Boris
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 05:20:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:48 GMT