W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: TAG Comment on

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:28:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dJvyxP2k0NgQXDsQkyTyq8oh0A0mQgS+9yLh9OOUrgfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Art.Barstow@nokia.com
Cc: nrm@arcanedomain.com, public-webapps@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org, w3c@adambarth.com
Perhaps. But widely implemented does not necessarily imply widely used. In
any case, support for or use of a feature of a WD or CR does not imply it
must be present in REC.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:21 PM, <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> wrote:

>   >* From:* ext Glenn Adams [glenn@skynav.com]
> *> *
>  > Could you quantify "widely"?
>
>  I think this definition of "widely used" is useful for this context:
> http://caniuse.com/#search=storage
>
>  Personally, I see little to negative value in ignoring the fact the
> "ship has sailed" for this spec.
>
>  -AB
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
>
>> These APIs are quite widely used on the web.  It seems unlikely that
>> we'll be able to delete either of them in favor of a single facility.
>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 01:29:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:48 GMT