W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?

From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:35:22 +0100
To: "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "Karl Dubost" <karld@opera.com>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "chairs.w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>, "public-webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v4x8k8my6ugkrk@giuseppep-x220>
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:31:55 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>  
wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:19:37 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>  
> wrote:
>> Better yet, dump the "2" version number and just have /XMLHttpRequest2/  
>> point to /XMLHttpRequest/.
>>
>> Everything in 1 is in 2, so making a big deal out of this is a valuable  
>> waste of time justifying the decision.
>>
>> There is no point in having "Level 1" and "Level 2" since there is no  
>> "Level 1"… there is just "XMLHttpRequest" :)
>
> I favor this approach.
>
If that's the case would be possible to replace xhr 1 spec text with xhr 2  
text spec and drop 2?
Any issue in doing that?



-- 
Giuseppe Pascale
TV & Connected Devices
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 18:36:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:48 GMT