- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:19:37 +0100
- To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, "chairs.w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Monday, November 14, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote: > I would like to point out that there could be other specifications out in > the wild referencing XHR 1. > > This doesn't mean that you should not drop XHR 1, but would be good if the > WG prepares a (short) note that gives the background around this decision > and few info about the XHR 2 work, how it differs from XHR 1 and how to > update references. Such a note could be sent to all (relevant) WGs/IGs > and for those of us active also in groups outside W3C could be used to > inform people about the change with some "official" text Or we could avoid the whole thing and just have: http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/ redirect to: http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest2/ Better yet, dump the "2" version number and just have /XMLHttpRequest2/ point to /XMLHttpRequest/. Everything in 1 is in 2, so making a big deal out of this is a valuable waste of time justifying the decision. There is no point in having "Level 1" and "Level 2" since there is no "Level 1"… there is just "XMLHttpRequest" :)
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 18:20:18 UTC