W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Consolidating charter changes

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:29:29 +0000
To: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <robin@berjon.com>, <jhawkins@google.com>, <public-webapps@w3.org>, <chaals@opera.com>, <ifette@google.com>
Message-ID: <7D326AE4-F6AD-4320-A16D-8E4B90AE266D@nokia.com>
+1 , separate mail list, task force, joint deliverable,  participation of members of both WGs.  Is there any problem remaining?

but use "DAP" instead of "DAPI" in your communications, Art :)

thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Nov 10, 2011, at 8:36 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:

> On 11/10/11 4:36 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 00:25 , James Hawkins wrote:
>>> Under 'Additions Agreed':
>>> * Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG
>>> 
>>> Pedantically, not politically: My recollection is that the agreement was only to add Web Intents to the Webapps charter (neither accepting nor denying a joint deliverable with DAPI).  The status of the joint deliverable is still a possibility, just technically not agreed upon as of yet.  It may be best to reword this to state that the possibility still exists, so those not in attendance don't get the idea that we agreed to a joint deliverable at the meeting.
>> My recollection, which seems to be supported by the minutes, is that Chaals supported moving this to DAP, Google (collectively) wouldn't object to a joint deliverable, Maciej said Apple couldn't join DAP as-is but I don't recall issues with joint work. Rough consensus seemed to drift towards joint work. At the DAP meeting, where the notion of a joint deliverable was accepted, Jonas (amongst several others) specifically requested that this happen on a separate mailing list. So unless we are keen to rathole on politics I'd suggest we just go with that, no? An additional plus is that doing it jointly means we can start right now and not wait for WebApps to recharter.
>> 
>> I'll have a joint TF proposal out here very soon.
> 
> As the discussion on October 31 was ending, I asked if anyone objected to a joint deliverable and no one did [1]. Given DAP is agreeable with cooperating with WebApps on Web Intents, it seems like the most expeditious and practical way forward is to create a list for related discussions.
> 
> -AB
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/10/31-webapps-minutes.html#item06
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 22:30:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:48 GMT