W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Consolidating charter changes

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:46:02 +0100
To: "ext Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, "James Hawkins" <jhawkins@google.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Ian Fette" <ifette@google.com>
Message-ID: <op.v4qgi0newxe0ny@widsith.eng.oslo.osa>
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:36:24 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>  
wrote:

> On 11/10/11 4:36 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 00:25 , James Hawkins wrote:
>>> Under 'Additions Agreed':
>>> * Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG
>>>
>>> Pedantically, not politically: My recollection is that the agreement  
>>> was only to add Web Intents to the Webapps charter (neither accepting  
>>> nor denying a joint deliverable with DAPI).  The status of the joint  
>>> deliverable is still a possibility, just technically not agreed upon  
>>> as of yet.  It may be best to reword this to state that the  
>>> possibility still exists, so those not in attendance don't get the  
>>> idea that we agreed to a joint deliverable at the meeting.

>> My recollection, which seems to be supported by the minutes, is that  
>> Chaals supported moving this to DAP, Google (collectively) wouldn't  
>> object to a joint deliverable, Maciej said Apple couldn't join DAP  
>> as-is but I don't recall issues with joint work. Rough consensus seemed  
>> to drift towards joint work. At the DAP meeting, where the notion of a  
>> joint deliverable was accepted, Jonas (amongst several others)  
>> specifically requested that this happen on a separate mailing list. So  
>> unless we are keen to rathole on politics I'd suggest we just go with  
>> that, no? An additional plus is that doing it jointly means we can  
>> start right now and not wait for WebApps to recharter.
>>
>> I'll have a joint TF proposal out here very soon.
>
> As the discussion on October 31 was ending, I asked if anyone objected  
> to a joint deliverable and no one did [1]. Given DAP is agreeable with  
> cooperating with WebApps on Web Intents, it seems like the most  
> expeditious and practical way forward is to create a list for related  
> discussions.

Agreed.

cheers

-- 
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 13:46:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:48 GMT