W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

RE: [IndexedDB] Throwing when *creating* a transaction

From: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 06:15:29 +0000
To: "jsbell@google.com" <jsbell@google.com>
CC: "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F695AF7AA77CC745A271AD0F61BBC61E3F522CF7@TK5EX14MBXC115.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
IE is okay with removing this from the spec.

Israel

On Monday, October 31, 2011 5:06 PM, Joshua Bell wrote:
From: jsbell@google.com [mailto:jsbell@google.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Bell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 5:06 PM
To: Webapps WG
Subject: Re: [IndexedDB] Throwing when *creating* a transaction

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc<mailto:jonas@sicking.cc>> wrote:
Hi guys,

Currently the spec contains the following sentence:

"Conforming user agents must automatically abort a transaction at the
end of the scope in which it was created, if an exception is
propagated to that scope."

This means that the following code:

setTimeout(function() {
 doStuff();
 throw "booo";
}, 10);

function doStuff() {
 var trans = db.transaction(["store1"], IDBTransaction.READ_WRITE)
 trans.objectStore("store1").put({ some: "value" }, 5);
}

is supposed to abort the transaction. I.e. since the same callback (in
this case a setTimeout callback) which created the transaction later
on throws, the spec says to abort the transaction. This was something
that we debated a long time ago, but my recollection was that we
should not spec this behavior. It appears that this was never removed
from the spec though.

One reason that I don't think that we should spec this behavior is
that it's extremely tedious and error prone to implement. At every
point that an implementation calls into javascript, the implementation
has to add code which checks if an exception was thrown and if so,
check if any transactions were started, and if so abort them.

I'd like to simply remove this sentence. Any objections?

No objections here. Chrome doesn't currently implement this behavior.

Note, this does *not* affect the aborting that happens if an exception
is thrown during a "success" or "error" event handler.

/ Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 06:19:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:48 GMT