- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:50:45 -0400
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
On 10/18/11 6:05 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: > They would run in their own sandbox and they would have access to the > parameters passed into the function by way of pattern. OK; I think that people might have a pretty tough time with a programming environment like that... but maybe. > The 'match' in this case wouldn't be > a mutable DOM element. You can give it a smaller API by saying that > the 'lite' version of the element that is passed in has no properties > which might give you something mutable So no properties at all? >- or you can say that all > methods/properties would also return immutable shadows of themselves. It'd have to be that... > I would be happy to walk through more detailed ideas in terms of what > specifically that would look like if there were some kind of initial > "yeah, that might work - its worth looking into some more" :) On my part it's a "yeah, it might work, with a huge amount of effort, probably disproportionate to the utility". At least at first blush. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 00:51:16 UTC