W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:13:38 +0200
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Cameron McCormack" <cmccormack@mozilla.com>
Cc: arun@mozilla.com, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <sicking@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v2tk80x064w2qv@cm->
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:37:41 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> Another option which just occurred to me is to actually use
> DOMException objects. The ECMAScript error objects don't actually have
> anything "exception specific" about them. DOMException only does so by
> name of the interface.
> Either way is fine with me.

DOMException is also not an "interface" in IDL terms, it's an "exception".  
It would be great if Cameron could weigh in here as either way is fine  
with me too.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 09:14:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:36 UTC