- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:10:39 +0200
- To: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:16:46 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > So it sounds like your argument is that we should do <meta> prescan > because we can do it without breaking any new ground. Not because it's > better or was inherently safer before webkit tried it out. It does seem better to decode resources in the manner they are encoded. > I'd much rather first debate what behavior we want and if we can try > if that is safe. > > And we always have the option of only doing HTML parsing when > .responseType is set to "document". That is unlikely to break a lot of > content. And it saves users resources as it uses less memory. I think it should have the same behavior as XML. No reason to make it harder for HTML. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 06:11:12 UTC