W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: [editing] Using public-webapps for editing discussion

From: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:30:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABNRm63UJ-gJzcjcz8Jb5B+j0t7cZJOotO2W7AgLz6OsKXg2LA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
Cc: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan@mozilla.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, W3C WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
I think it's a great idea to get your spec more attention in W3C community
specially because some UA vendors don't participate in discussions on
whatwg.

- Ryosuke

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote:

> For the last several months, I was working on a new specification,
> which I hosted on aryeh.name.  Now we've created a new Community Group
> at the W3C to host it:
>
> http://aryeh.name/spec/editing/editing.html
> http://www.w3.org/community/editing/
>
> Things are still being worked out, but one issue is what mailing list
> to use for discussion.  I don't want to create new tiny mailing lists
> -- I think we should reuse some existing established list where the
> stakeholders are already present.  Previously I was using the whatwg
> list, but as a token of good faith toward the W3C, I'd prefer to
> switch to public-webapps, even though my spec is not a WebApps WG
> deliverable.  (If it ever does move to a REC track spec, though, which
> the Community Group process makes easy, it will undoubtedly be in the
> WebApps WG.)
>
> Does anyone object to using this list to discuss the editing spec?
>
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:31:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:47 GMT