W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: [DOM] Name

From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:33:17 -0700
Message-Id: <C2351C0F-22E2-461F-9ADC-D52EF6A4DEF4@jumis.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Jacob Rossi <jrossi@microsoft.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>




On Sep 5, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
>> On 9/4/11 6:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:12:45 +0200, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> The CfC to publish a new WD of DOM Core was blocked by this RfC. I will
>> proceed with a  request to publish a new WD of DOM Core in TR/. The name DOM
>> Core will be used for the upcoming WD. If anyone wants to propose a name
>> change, please start a *new* thread.
>> 
>> Given that the specification replaces most of DOM2 and DOM3 I suggest we
>> name it DOM4, including for the upcoming WD (or alternatively a WD we
>> publish a couple of weeks later).
>> 
>> I propose calling it "Web Core".
>> WC1 (Web Core version 1).
> 
> WebCore is one of the major implementation components of WebKit.
> Calling this spec Web Core might be confusing for folks who work on
> WebKit.  It would be somewhat like calling a spec Presto.  :)

Or calling a browser "Chrome".

Web Core does implement web core, doesn't it?
>> 
>> 
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 21:33:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:47 GMT