- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:33:17 -0700
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Jacob Rossi <jrossi@microsoft.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On Sep 5, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: >> On 9/4/11 6:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> >> On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:12:45 +0200, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> >> wrote: >> >> The CfC to publish a new WD of DOM Core was blocked by this RfC. I will >> proceed with a request to publish a new WD of DOM Core in TR/. The name DOM >> Core will be used for the upcoming WD. If anyone wants to propose a name >> change, please start a *new* thread. >> >> Given that the specification replaces most of DOM2 and DOM3 I suggest we >> name it DOM4, including for the upcoming WD (or alternatively a WD we >> publish a couple of weeks later). >> >> I propose calling it "Web Core". >> WC1 (Web Core version 1). > > WebCore is one of the major implementation components of WebKit. > Calling this spec Web Core might be confusing for folks who work on > WebKit. It would be somewhat like calling a spec Presto. :) Or calling a browser "Chrome". Web Core does implement web core, doesn't it? >> >>
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 21:33:56 UTC