- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 18:54:12 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > > But, the WHATWG HTML links to the editor's drafts and does not link to > the TR one. While documents on the REC-track should link to other > documents on the REC tracks, this doesn't apply to editor's draft, which > have no special status anyway. So, you can link to both versions in the > editor's draft if you prefer. Well, the editor's drafts have one special status: they're the most correct drafts, unlike the TR/ drafts, which are often obsolete as soon as they're published (in the case of the HTML spec, they're obsolete _before_ they're published, since the publication process takes several days). So it's not entirely true that they have no special status. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2011 18:56:02 UTC