- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:33:20 -0700
- To: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- Cc: Julien Richard-Foy <julien@richard-foy.fr>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> I agree with this, but it might be too late to make this change. >> >> The problem is that if we returned an Array object, it would not have >> a .item function, which the currently returned NodeList has. >> >> I guess we could return a Array object and add a .item function to it. > > Or return a NodeList and add .forEach/.filter/etc. to it? That works, but what is the advantage? And .push/.pop or other mutating functions wouldn't work. / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 06:34:17 UTC