W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

RE: Possible errata for http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/

From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:05:08 +0000
To: │┬╠ýÍ█ <tianzhouchen@gmail.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE3A5BFD1228D84A8D9C158EEC195FD53CCE5FDF@TK5EX14MBXW605.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Thank you Tianzhou. I have made the suggested change in the Editorí»s Draft of 16 August.

Cheers,

Eliot

From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:12 PM
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Possible errata for http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/


Hi there,
     I have read the spec and I spot one minor issue in the spec:

- 3.1.8 Requests. 2nd paragraph.

Finally, requests have a request transaction. When a request is created, it is always placed against atransaction using either the steps to a asynchronously execute a request or the steps to a synchronously execute a request. This sets the request transaction to be that request.

Should be

Finally, requests have a request transaction. When a request is created, it is always placed against atransaction using either the steps to a asynchronously execute a request or the steps to a synchronously execute a request. This sets the request transaction to be that transaction.

Thanks
Tianzhou
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2011 23:05:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:47 GMT